linux-kernel - Re: [RFT][PATCH v7 5/8] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:59:57 +0100
From:   Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
        "Rik van Riel" <riel@...riel.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Mike Galbraith" <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v7 5/8] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from
 cpuidle_select()

On 2018-03-21 15:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> So please disregard this one entirely and take the v7.2 replacement
> instead of it:https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10299429/
> 
> The current versions (including the above) is in the git branch at
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
>   idle-loop-v7.2

With v7.2 (tested on SKL-SP from git) I see similar behavior in idle
as with v5: several cores which just keep the sched tick enabled.
Worse yet, some go only in C1 (not even C1E!?) despite sleeping the
full sched tick.
The resulting power consumption is ~105 W instead of ~ 70 W.

https://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~tilsche/powernightmares/v7_2_skl_sp_idle.png

I have briefly ran v7 and I believe it was also affected.