[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1521664274.23017.92.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:31:14 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] gpiolib: Support 'gpio-reserved-ranges' property
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 12:59 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2018-03-21 10:59:10)
> > On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:58 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > + gpiochip->valid_mask = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(gpiochip-
> > > > ngpio),
> > >
> > > + sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Just noticed that kcalloc is superfluous here.
> > kmalloc_array() would be enough.
> >
>
> Ok. I was copying the irqchip style. Should I fold them together into
> a
> helper function and also update to kmalloc_array?
Not sure about first part, but definitely makes sense the second one (as
a separate patch perhaps).
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists