[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180321.175427.1419929873765406157.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc: okaya@...eaurora.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
sulrich@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700
> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>> wmb().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h | 5 -----
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
confidence if the code does not even compile.
Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists