[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D63776B2-09B1-428C-99B7-68F4BD9BC7E8@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 07:53:08 +0100
From: Benjamin Warnke <4bwarnke@...ormatik.uni-hamburg.de>
To: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, minchan@...nel.org,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 v4] add compression algorithm zBeWalgo
Hi Philippe,
> Actually to be consistent if you want to use GPL-2-0 (and not "or
> later") you should use:
>
> 1. at the top, for a c. file:
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> or for a .h file:
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>
> The doc explains it all. Including the comment style (a topic that has
> been discussed also on list quite bit: Linus had the final word there)
>
> 2. and in your MODULE_LICENSE macro:
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> .... because a MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); would mean GPL-2.0+ (e.g. or any
> later version) and this would not match your top level license tag.
Thanks, I have done this correctly in my files, but accidentally written it wrong in my mail.
Cordinally
Benjamin Warnke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists