linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 13/14] xfs: prepare xfs_break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180322072734.GB28713@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:27:34 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/14] xfs: prepare xfs_break_layouts() for another
        layout type

> +	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL
> +				| (reason == BREAK_UNMAPI
> +					? XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL : 0)));

please split the assert, e.g.:

	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));

	switch (reason) {
+	case BREAK_UNMAPI:
		ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
> +		/* fall through */
> +	case BREAK_WRITE:
> +		error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &did_unlock);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		error = -EINVAL;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return error;

I have to say I'd prefer BREAK_UNMAP over BREAK_UNMAPI given that weird
I suffix doesn't buy us anything, but that's just a minor issue.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>