[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1803221026130.1579@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:26:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/45] x86: use _do_fork() in compat_sys_x86_clone()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> It is trivial to directly call _do_fork() instead of the sys_clone()
> syscall in compat_sys_x86_clone().
>
> This patch is part of a series which tries to remove in-kernel calls to
> syscalls. On this basis, the syscall entry path can be streamlined.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists