lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1803221026130.1579@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:26:35 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/45] x86: use _do_fork() in compat_sys_x86_clone()

On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Dominik Brodowski wrote:

> It is trivial to directly call _do_fork() instead of the sys_clone()
> syscall in compat_sys_x86_clone().
> 
> This patch is part of a series which tries to remove in-kernel calls to
> syscalls. On this basis, the syscall entry path can be streamlined.
> 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ