[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180322093745.GC4229@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 06:37:45 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <daniel@...stot.me>,
Luis Claudio R. Gonçalves
<lclaudio@...hat.com>, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target: Use WARNON_NON_RT(!irqs_disabled())
Em Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:43:58AM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> [ Adding PeterZ to participants due to query about lockdep_assert() ]
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > assert_spin_locked(&cmd->t_state_lock);
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE_NONRT(!irqs_disabled());
>
> Ugh.
>
> Can't we just replace both of those with a lockdep annotation?
Huh, even better, when that feature gets finished (tglx said it was
being developed, not there yet tho) it'll allow further reduction of the
PREEMPT_RT_FULL patchkit.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists