linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 4/5] typec: tcpm: Represent source supply through power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2E89032DDAA8B9408CB92943514A0337014C1E28A3@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:40:01 +0000
From:   Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Jun Li <jun.li@....com>
CC:     "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Support Opensource" <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/5] typec: tcpm: Represent source supply through
 power_supply

On 22 March 2018 04:09, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> > +static int tcpm_psy_set_prop(struct power_supply *psy,
> > +			     enum power_supply_property psp,
> > +			     const union power_supply_propval *val)
> > +{
> > +	struct tcpm_port *port = power_supply_get_drvdata(psy);
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	switch (psp) {
> > +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ONLINE:
> > +		ret = tcpm_psy_set_online(port, val);
> > +		break;
> > +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW:
> > +		if ((val->intval < (port->pps_data.min_volt * 1000)) ||
> > +		    (val->intval > (port->pps_data.max_volt * 1000)))
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		else
> > +			ret = tcpm_pps_set_out_volt(port, (val->intval / 1000));
> > +		break;
> > +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW:
> > +		if (val->intval > (port->pps_data.max_curr * 1000))
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		else
> > +			ret = tcpm_pps_set_op_curr(port, (val->intval / 1000));
> 
> I am really not a friend of excessive ( ).

Yes, I got that. :) I am of the opinion that they should be used to enforce
precedence. This to me is good coding practice and makes it unambiguous for the
reader. That's why I use them as above. Do you think the above uses make it
harder to understand or more difficult to maintain?