[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180322123557.4eu4huhldqn6bid6@angband.pl>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:35:57 +0100
From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
To: René Rebe <rene@...ctcode.com>
Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Julian Andres Klode <julian.klode@...onical.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for ZSTD-compressed kernel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:09:45PM +0100, René Rebe wrote:
> Should this currently just work without any arch change on e.g.
> ppc64, sparc64 et al.? I could do a test build and boot if that is
> of any value, ...
Initrd: no reason it wouldn't work, although for anything related to the
boot process testing is a very good idea. If you test, you'd really want to
apply that printk patch I posted, it's too easy to accidentally get a silent
fallback to gzip or uncompressed. I wonder, perhaps such a printk could be
permanently added, at a low message priority?
Kernel itself: needs per-arch porting, but it's not advertised in kconfig
outside x86 so that's not a problem.
If you are knowledgeful about bootloaders on ppc64, sparc64, etc, such
information would be great.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ A master species delegates.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists