[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180322132950.lkljwy2w7mobzgp2@fsr-ub1664-175>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:29:51 +0000
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: imx: Correct dram pll type
Hi Fabio,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:31:03AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> This has already been applied in linux-next as commit:
>
> commit b716aad97eb5 ("clk: imx: imx7d: correct video pll clock tree)
OK. Will create the patchset again without this one.
>
> Nit: the prefix in the Subject lines of all these patches should not
> be "arm:imx".
>
> "clk: imx: imx7d" is better suited to reflect the subsystem that thes
> patches touch.
Will change this too.
Which repo/branch should this patchset be created against ?
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists