linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: ODEBUG bug in process_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:13:58 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+3b4acab09b6463472d0a@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        danielj@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        monis@...lanox.com, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        parav@...lanox.com, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yuval.shaia@...cle.com
Subject: Re: WARNING: ODEBUG bug in process_one_req

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:47:41PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:10:21PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> >> This bug is actively happening several times per day, if such bug is
> >> >> closed syzbot will open another bug on the next crash.
> >> >> This bug has a reproducer, why do you think it is invalid?
> >> >
> >> > I tried to reproduce it on latest rdma-next and failed, so wanted to
> >> > start from clean page and see if it is still relevant.
> >>
> >> Ah,  I see.
> >> You can now see the current status on dashboard:
> >> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d4ac7bfeafac8a3d6d06123e078462ac765415e7
> >> Yes, it still happens.
> >>
> >> syzbot has already reported another incarnation of this bug, you can
> >> see the link to dashboard in the email:
> >> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8d5eb964e412cfd2678
> >> and it contains a link to the first version with reproducer.
> >>
> >> > Does it still reproduce on latest rdma-next?
> >>
> >> syzbot does not test rdma-next.
> >>
> >> But can you reproduce it on upstream tree where syzbot hits it? Just
> >> to make sure, you have ODEBUG enabled, right?
> >
> > Thanks for the tip, I added more debug options and returned to try the
> > repro on clean v4.16-rc1, it looks like I still don't have all needed
> > config options (SELinux).
> >
> >   mount(selinuxfs) failed (errno 2)
>
>
> It seems that you have old syzkaller sources, it now explicitly does
> not fail on ENOENT:
>
>     // selinux mount used to be at /selinux, but then moved to /sys/fs/selinux.
>     const char* selinux_path = "./syz-tmp/newroot/selinux";
>     if (mount("/selinux", selinux_path, NULL, mount_flags, NULL)) {
>         if (errno != ENOENT)
>             fail("mount(/selinux) failed");
>         if (mount("/sys/fs/selinux", selinux_path, NULL, mount_flags,
> NULL) && errno != ENOENT)
>             fail("mount(/sys/fs/selinux) failed");
>     }
>
>
> > Can you please cancel my email that closes this bug?
>
> There is no such option. The new bug is already created:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6ecd3fdba0501c8843300056375abea0880816d2
> now if we open the old one, we now have 2 for the same root cause. It
> will lead to mess.

Still no luck, I'll leave this bug for now.

Thanks

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)