linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/10] iommu/amd: make amd_iommu_devtable_lock a spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180322152242.12705-10-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:22:41 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] iommu/amd: make amd_iommu_devtable_lock a spin_lock

Before commit 0bb6e243d7fb ("iommu/amd: Support IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA type
allocation") amd_iommu_devtable_lock had a read_lock() user but now
there are none. In fact, after the mentioned commit we had only
write_lock() user of the lock. Since there is no reason to keep it as
writer lock, change its type to a spin_lock.
I *think* that we might even be able to remove the lock because all its
current user seem to have their own protection.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index c493d345b3ef..23e26a4b708e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
  */
 #define AMD_IOMMU_PGSIZES	((~0xFFFUL) & ~(2ULL << 38))
 
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(amd_iommu_devtable_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(amd_iommu_devtable_lock);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pd_bitmap_lock);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iommu_table_lock);
 
@@ -2097,9 +2097,9 @@ static int attach_device(struct device *dev,
 	}
 
 skip_ats_check:
-	write_lock_irqsave(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
 	ret = __attach_device(dev_data, domain);
-	write_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * We might boot into a crash-kernel here. The crashed kernel
@@ -2149,9 +2149,9 @@ static void detach_device(struct device *dev)
 	domain   = dev_data->domain;
 
 	/* lock device table */
-	write_lock_irqsave(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
 	__detach_device(dev_data);
-	write_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
 
 	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
 		return;
@@ -2814,7 +2814,7 @@ static void cleanup_domain(struct protection_domain *domain)
 	struct iommu_dev_data *entry;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	write_lock_irqsave(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
 
 	while (!list_empty(&domain->dev_list)) {
 		entry = list_first_entry(&domain->dev_list,
@@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static void cleanup_domain(struct protection_domain *domain)
 		__detach_device(entry);
 	}
 
-	write_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void protection_domain_free(struct protection_domain *domain)
-- 
2.16.2