lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:11:30 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] x86/microcode/AMD: Check patch size in
 verify_and_add_patch()

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:08:17AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static unsigned int verify_patch_size(u8 family, u32 patch_size,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (patch_size > min_t(u32, size, max_size)) {
> +	if (patch_size > min_t(size_t, size, max_size)) {

So I don't like this conversion to 8-byte-width size_t's. It is not
necessary. I'm pretty sure we can do fine with signed and unsigned ints.

For example, you can convert the size to signed int (if it hasn't been
converted yet) and check for < 0 and stop further processing. And so on...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. Srsly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ