[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180322164710.GA31876@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:47:10 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Xiaofeng Wei <xiaofeng.wei@....com>
Cc: wim@...ana.be, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hongjun.chen@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: booke_wdt: Disable the watchdog prior to
setting a new timeout value in order to avoid the following situation
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:51:46AM +0800, Xiaofeng Wei wrote:
> A watchdog timer exception also occurs if the selected time base bit transitions from 0 to 1 due
> to an mtspr that writes a 1 to the bit when its previous value was 0.
>
Please drop "in order to ..." from the subject line. Every patch hopefully does
that.
> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Wei <xiaofeng.wei@....com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
> index 3ad1e44..70e742c 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
> @@ -186,9 +186,15 @@ static int booke_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdog)
> static int booke_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev,
> unsigned int timeout)
> {
> + if (watchdog_active(wdt_dev))
> + on_each_cpu(__booke_wdt_disable, NULL, 0);
> +
Thios would only be necessary if the timeout actually changes. Also, does
the problem apply to _all_ chips supported by this driver or only to a
subset ?
Guenter
> wdt_dev->timeout = timeout;
> booke_wdt_set(wdt_dev);
>
> + if (watchdog_active(wdt_dev))
> + on_each_cpu(__booke_wdt_enable, wdt_dev, 0);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists