linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/45] sched: add do_sched_yield() helper; remove in-kernel call to sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:41:43 +0100
From:   Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/45] sched: add do_sched_yield() helper; remove
 in-kernel call to sched_yield()

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 06:29:59PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:00:37AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > Using the sched-internal do_sched_yield() helper allows us to get rid of
> > the sched-internal call to the sys_sched_yield() syscall.
> > 
> > This patch is part of a series which tries to remove in-kernel calls to
> > syscalls. On this basis, the syscall entry path can be streamlined.
> 
> But why !? Either Cc me on more of the series such that the whole makes
> sense, or better yet, write a proper Changelog.

Well, the summary is right there in the changelog: Kernel code simply should
not pretend to be userspace and call a syscall function. For a more
detailled description, see, for instance, Linus' explanation in
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFwo7yA1gm8AUYMEQA8ZNY-9GGF8Oup09jJFvEa4J7C+jA@mail.gmail.com :

| On x86-64, we'd like to just pass the 'struct pt_regs *' pointer, and
| have the sys_xyz() function itself just pick out the arguments it
| needs from there.
|
| That has a few reasons for it:
| 
| - we can clear all registers at system call entry, which helps defeat
| some of the "pass seldom used register with user-controlled value that
| survives deep into the callchain" things that people used to leak
| information
| 
|  - we can streamline the low-level system call code, which needs to
| pass around 'struct pt_regs *' anyway, and the system call only picks
| up the values it actually needs

I can add such a long description to all these patches, but that seems to
be a bit... longwinded.

Thanks,
	Dominik