[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180322223932.GB17542@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 23:39:32 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, michaelsh@...lanox.com,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] platform/x86: mlx-platform: Add differed bus
functionality
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:18:40PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 03:58:18PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:09:34PM +0000, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> > > > Add deferred bus functionality in order to enforce probing flow execution
> > > > order. Driver mlx-platform activates platform driver i2c-mux-reg, which
> > > > creates busses infrastructure, after that it activates mlxreg-hotplug
> > > > driver, which uses these busses, for connecting devices. The possible
> > > > miss-ordering can happened, for example in case the probing routine of
> > > > mlxreg-hotplug is already started execution, while i2c-mux-reg probing
> > > > routine is not completed yet. In such situation the first one could
> > > > attempt to connect device to adapter number, which is not created yet.
> > > > And as a result this connection will fail. In order to ensure the order of
> > > > probing execution on mlxreg-hotplug probe routine will be deferred until
> > > > all the busses is not created by probe routine of i2c-mux-reg.
> > > > In order to ensure the flow order, mlx-platform driver passes the highest
> > > > bus number to the mlxreg-hotplug platform data, which in their turn could
> > > > wait in the deferred state, until all the necessary buses topology is not
> > > > exist.
> > >
> > > Vadim,
> > >
> > > I've got part way through a review of this series several times, and keep
> > > running out of time trying to determine if the solution is appropriate
> > > for the problem.
> > >
> > > The deferred probing waiting for the i2c bus to be available seems like
> > > something we might be able to handle more elegantly with:
> > >
> > > 1) request_module() in the platform driver
> > > 2) careful use of init levels (subsys, device, late)
> > >
> > > This isn't something I'm well versed in - so I'll reach out here for
> > > some advice from Greg and the i2c maintainer, Wolfram, and list (added
> > > to Cc).
> >
> > deferred device probe?
> >
>
> This patch series adds the following, which I believe is what you're referring
> to Greg? :
>
> + /* Defer probing if the necessary adapter is not configured yet. */
> + deferred_adap = i2c_get_adapter(pdata->deferred_nr);
> + if (!deferred_adap)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> This is the preferred approach? Have the platform driver define the expected
> adapter number, and then defer until that becomes available?
Yes, that is what that interface is for, so it should work like this.
But someone should test of course :)
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists