[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3441706.zTHvev0s8F@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:22:27 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...lessm.com,
chiu@...lessm.com, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / PM: allow deeper wakeup power states with no _SxD nor _SxW
On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 5:07:35 AM CET Daniel Drake wrote:
> acpi_dev_pm_get_state() is used to determine the range of allowable
> device power states when going into S3 suspend. This is implemented
> by executing the _S3D and _S3W ACPI methods.
>
> Linux follows the ACPI spec behaviour in that when _S3D is implemented
> and _S3W is not, Linux will not go into a power state deeper than the one
> returned by _S3D for a wakeup-enabled device.
>
> However, this same logic is being applied to the case when neither
> _S3D nor _S3W are present, and the result is that this function
> decides that the device must stay in D0 (fully on) state.
>
> This is breaking USB wakeups on Asus V222GA and Acer XC-830. _S3D and
> _S3W are not present, so the USB controller is left in the D0 running
> state during S3, and hence it is unable to generate a PME# wake event.
>
> The ACPI spec is unclear on which power states are permissable for
> wakeup-enabled devices when both _S3D and _S3W are missing.
> However, USB wakeups work fine on these platforms under Windows, where
> device manager shows that they are using D3 device state for the USB
> controller in S3.
>
> I assume that the "max = min" clamping done by the code here is
> specifically written for the _S3D but no _S3W case. By making the
> code true to those conditions, avoiding them on these platforms,
> the controller will be put into D3 state and USB wakeups start working.
>
> Additionally I feel that this change makes the code more directly
> mirror the wording of the ACPI spec and it's associated lack of clarity.
>
> Thanks to Mathias Nyman for pointing us in the right direction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAB4CAwf_k-WsF3zL4epm9TKAOu0h=Bv1XhXV_gY3bziOo_NPKA@mail.gmail.com
>
> https://phabricator.endlessm.com/T21410
> ---
>
> Notes:
> This should be considered for Linux 4.17 to give it a decent amount
> of testing time before release.
>
> v2: fix unused variable warning
>
> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> index c4d0a1c912f0..3d96e4da2d98 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> @@ -543,6 +543,7 @@ static int acpi_dev_pm_get_state(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *adev,
> unsigned long long ret;
> int d_min, d_max;
> bool wakeup = false;
> + bool has_sxd = false;
> acpi_status status;
>
> /*
> @@ -581,6 +582,10 @@ static int acpi_dev_pm_get_state(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *adev,
> else
> return -ENODATA;
> }
> +
> + if (status == AE_OK)
> + has_sxd = true;
> +
> d_min = ret;
> wakeup = device_may_wakeup(dev) && adev->wakeup.flags.valid
> && adev->wakeup.sleep_state >= target_state;
> @@ -599,7 +604,11 @@ static int acpi_dev_pm_get_state(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *adev,
> method[3] = 'W';
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, NULL, &ret);
> if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> - if (target_state > ACPI_STATE_S0)
> + /* No _SxW. In this case, the ACPI spec says that we
> + * must not go into any power state deeper than the
> + * value returned from _SxD.
> + */
> + if (has_sxd && target_state > ACPI_STATE_S0)
> d_max = d_min;
> } else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && ret <= ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) {
> /* Fall back to D3cold if ret is not a valid state. */
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists