[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180322233027.bh6dp5vdcb4rdvqe@agluck-desk>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:30:29 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Luck@...son-desk.jf.intel.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, brice.goglin@...il.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86,sched: allow topologies where NUMA nodes share an
LLC
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 01:49:22PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote:
> + if (!topology_same_node(c, o) &&
> + (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
> + c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X)) {
Maybe make life easier in the future to add more models
to the list by using x86_match_cpu() here?
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists