linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial: samsung: macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <2f2dcf3c-2432-3dc7-5fd4-f9326ef48455@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:37:45 +0900
From:   "y.k.oh" <y.k.oh@...sung.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     jslaby@...e.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: samsung: macros with complex values should be
 enclosed in parentheses



On 03/14/2018 10:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0900, YOUNGKEUN OH wrote:
>> Cleanup checkpatch error:
>> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YOUNGKEUN OH <y.k.oh@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> index 3f2f8c1..da9bddb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>> @@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ static int __init s3c24xx_serial_console_init(void)
>>  }
>>  console_initcall(s3c24xx_serial_console_init);
>>
>> -#define S3C24XX_SERIAL_CONSOLE &s3c24xx_serial_console
>> +#define S3C24XX_SERIAL_CONSOLE (&s3c24xx_serial_console)
> 
> That's not a complex macro!
> 
> Please use checkpatch as a hint, not the "truth".
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
Dear Greg.

Yes! Of course that's not a pretty complex macro. However, I think it is
important to make a small effort to modify the minimum standard,
Checkpatch ERROR, to ensure consistency in the Linux code.
Starting with this Checkpatch error of samsung.c, I would like to start
my efforts on contribution from a small point.  Please review it again.
If there are any points that require modification, such as comment,
then I'll modify it.
Thank you.

Best regards,
Youngkeun Oh