[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180322045710.vmmjr2wcankea45o@sapphire.tkos.co.il>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 06:57:10 +0200
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Ji Zhang <ji.zhang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@....de>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
shadanji@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: avoid race condition issue in dump_backtrace
Hi Ji Zhang,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:06:00AM +0800, Ji Zhang wrote:
> When we dump the backtrace of some specific task, there is a potential race
> condition due to the task may be running on other cores if SMP enabled.
> That is because for current implementation, if the task is not the current
> task, we will get the registers used for unwind from cpu_context saved in
> thread_info, which is the snapshot before context switch, but if the task
> is running on other cores, the registers and the content of stack are
> changed.
> This may cause that we get the wrong backtrace or incomplete backtrace or
> even crash the kernel.
> To avoid this case, do not dump the backtrace of the tasks which are
> running on other cores.
> This patch cannot solve the issue completely but can shrink the window of
> race condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ji Zhang <ji.zhang@...iatek.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index eb2d151..95749364 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
> if (tsk == current) {
> frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
> frame.pc = (unsigned long)dump_backtrace;
> + else if (tsk->state == TASK_RUNNING) {
Missing closing brace. Does this build?
> + pr_notice("Do not dump other running tasks\n");
> + return;
> } else {
> /*
> * task blocked in __switch_to
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists