[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323150806.GA6892@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:08:06 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/84] 4.15.13-stable review
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:52:45PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>
> > net: fec: add phy_reset_after_clk_enable() support
>
> This fails to build for arm32 with default config on both 4.14 and 4.15
>
> GCCVERSION ?= "linaro-6.2"
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c: In function 'fec_enet_clk_enable':
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c:1876:3: error: implicit declaration
> of function phy_reset_after_clk_enable [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> phy_reset_after_clk_enable(ndev->phydev);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Why is 0-day not showing me these errors? Is it not building arm32
anymore?
Anyway, thanks, let me look into this...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists