[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152182378792.178046.3747112581117251857@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:49:47 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset
framework
Quoting Bartosz Golaszewski (2018-03-23 06:04:47)
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> This series converts the only user of the handcoded, mach-specific reset
> routines in the davinci platform to using the reset framework.
>
> Patch 1 modifies the way lookup entries are registered with the reset
> framework.
>
> Patches 2-4 add necessary lookups/DT-properties.
>
> Patches 5-7 convert the davinci-rproc driver to the reset framework.
>
> Patch 8 removes now dead code.
>
> Philipp: it turned out that it's indeed better to use the reset
> controller's device name for the entry lookup.
>
> Tested both in DT and legacy modes by booting the examples from
> ti-ipc-rtos recipe in meta-ti.
>
> This series applies on top of David Lechner's common-clk-v9 branch[1]
> with Philipp Zabel's reset/next branch[2] pulled in.
>
> It can be found in my github tree as well[3].
>
What's the merge strategy for the rest of the patches? I should apply
the clk ones after the next -rc1?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists