[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323171736.bcyi2oiolge4l6hl@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:17:36 +0100
From: "bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"nab@...ux-iscsi.org" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...stot.me" <daniel@...stot.me>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"williams@...hat.com" <williams@...hat.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"lclaudio@...hat.com" <lclaudio@...hat.com>,
"target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] target: drop spin_lock_assert() + irqs_disabled() combo
checks
There are a few functions which check for if the lock is held
(spin_lock_assert()) and the interrupts are disabled (irqs_disabled()).
>From looking at the code, each function is static, the caller is near by
and does spin_lock_irq|safe(). As Linus puts it:
|It's not like this is some function that is exported to random users,
|and we should check that the calling convention is right.
|
|This looks like "it may have been useful during coding to document
|things, but it's not useful long-term".
Remove those checks.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c | 2 --
drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 6 ------
2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
index 9c7bc1ca341a..3d35dad1de2c 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
@@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ static bool __target_check_io_state(struct se_cmd *se_cmd,
{
struct se_session *sess = se_cmd->se_sess;
- assert_spin_locked(&sess->sess_cmd_lock);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
/*
* If command already reached CMD_T_COMPLETE state within
* target_complete_cmd() or CMD_T_FABRIC_STOP due to shutdown,
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
index 74b646f165d4..2c3ddb3a4124 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
@@ -2954,9 +2954,6 @@ __transport_wait_for_tasks(struct se_cmd *cmd, bool fabric_stop,
__acquires(&cmd->t_state_lock)
{
- assert_spin_locked(&cmd->t_state_lock);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
-
if (fabric_stop)
cmd->transport_state |= CMD_T_FABRIC_STOP;
@@ -3241,9 +3238,6 @@ static int __transport_check_aborted_status(struct se_cmd *cmd, int send_status)
{
int ret;
- assert_spin_locked(&cmd->t_state_lock);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
-
if (!(cmd->transport_state & CMD_T_ABORTED))
return 0;
/*
--
2.16.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists