linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 7/7] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1521829277-9398-8-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:21:17 -0400
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        sulrich@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 7/7] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 815cb1a..9e684b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -725,7 +725,12 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
+
+		/* We need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
+		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
+		 */
+		mmiowb();
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1232,7 +1237,12 @@ static int ixgbevf_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbevf_q_vector *q_vector,
 		 * know there are new descriptors to fetch.
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
+
+		/* We need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
+		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
+		 */
+		mmiowb();
 	}
 
 	u64_stats_update_begin(&rx_ring->syncp);
@@ -4004,7 +4014,12 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
 	tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
 
 	/* notify HW of packet */
-	writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
+
+	/* We need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
+	 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
+	 */
+	mmiowb();
 
 	return;
 dma_error:
-- 
2.7.4