[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <933dac0d-1be4-e952-7f53-0fa6d9169c9f@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:48:20 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linuxram@...ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86, pkeys: override pkey when moving away from
PROT_EXEC
On 03/23/2018 12:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> The fixes tag makes sense in general even if the patch is not tagged for
>> stable. It gives you immediate context and I use it a lot to look why this
>> went unnoticed or what the context of that change was.
> That said, I'm even lazier than you and prefer you to dig up the original
> commit :)
I'll have these tags in the next repost.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists