[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6072268.CPFKWgAbKZ@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 22:09:20 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
On Friday, March 23, 2018 7:09:24 AM CET Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 0953feed3400 ("cpufreq: schedutil: rate limits for SCHED_DEADLINE")
>
> Rafael, could you please send that to the scheduler tree?
You can apply from
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10278127/
and I will drop it from my tree.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists