[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323212230.GA12808@piout.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 22:22:30 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Allan Nielsen <Allan.Nielsen@...rosemi.com>,
razvan.stefanescu@....com, po.liu@....com,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/8] MIPS: mscc: Add switch to ocelot
On 23/03/2018 at 14:17:48 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 03/23/2018 01:11 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > +
> > + phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + };
> > + phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + };
> > + phy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
> > + reg = <2>;
> > + };
> > + phy3: ethernet-phy@3 {
> > + reg = <3>;
> > + };
>
> These PHYs should be defined at the board DTS level.
Those are internal PHYs, present on the SoC, I doubt anyone will have
anything different while using the same SoC.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists