[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323075054.jbmoijyikoy5rxgt@ninjato>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:50:54 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp" <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: pca-platform: additional improvements
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 03:39:47AM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 07/12/17 23:42, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 10:13:54PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> >>> This series addresses some of the points identified by Andy. The series is
> >>> based on top of i2c/for-next. 2 of the patches from v1 have already been
> >>> applied so I've dropped them from this version.
> >>>
> >>> I have compile tested patch 1/1 but I don't have access to sh hardware
> >>> to actually test the changes on.
> >>>
> >>> Chris Packham (4):
> >>> sh: sh7785lcr: add GPIO lookup table for i2c controller reset
> >>> i2c: pca-platform: unconditionally use devm_gpiod_get_optional
> >>> i2c: pca-platform: use device_property_read_u32
> >>> i2c: pca-platform: drop gpio from platform data
> >>>
> >>> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/boards/acvilon.c | 1 -
> >>> arch/sh/boards/board-sh7785lcr.c | 11 +++++++++-
> >>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c | 34 +++++++++----------------------
> >>> include/linux/i2c-pca-platform.h | 3 ---
> >>> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Series looks good to me, too. I'd need ACKs from the SH maintainers,
> >> though. Technically, from Blackfin maintainers as well. But I haven't
> >> heard from them in months, so I could go without that.
> >
> > Adding Rich Felker to CC...
> >
>
> Ping. Was there any movement on this series? I think this may have been
> caught up between the holiday period and various merge windows.
>
> Just wanted to check if there was anything I need to be doing to get
> this through.
No, there wasn't. I was waiting for ACKs from the maintainers, but
checking the arch/sh/-git-history, the last action I see from them is
~18 months ago. So, I'll pick up your patches without those acks...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists