[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323081209.GA27808@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:12:09 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/22] driver core: add per device iommu param
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 08:12:03PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> DMA faults can be detected by IOMMU at device level. Adding a pointer
> to struct device allows IOMMU subsystem to report relevant faults
> back to the device driver for further handling.
> For direct assigned device (or user space drivers), guest OS holds
> responsibility to handle and respond per device IOMMU fault.
> Therefore we need fault reporting mechanism to propagate faults beyond
> IOMMU subsystem.
>
> There are two other IOMMU data pointers under struct device today, here
> we introduce iommu_param as a parent pointer such that all device IOMMU
> data can be consolidated here. The idea was suggested here by Greg KH
> and Joerg. The name iommu_param is chosen here since iommu_data has been used.
>
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/6/81
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists