[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM5PR04MB3267DB8FE8E5AE98F59D7C45ECA80@AM5PR04MB3267.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:51:51 +0000
From: Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com" <geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] fsl/fman: remove unnecessary set_dma_ops() call and
HAS_DMA dependency
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 8:32 PM
> To: Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
> Cc: geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsl/fman: remove unnecessary set_dma_ops() call and
> HAS_DMA dependency
>
> From: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:58:19 -0500
>
> > The platform device is no longer used for DMA mapping so the
> > (questionable) setting of the DMA ops done here is no longer
> > needed. Removing it together with the HAS_DMA dependency that
> > it required.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
>
> This doesn't apply to any of my trees.
Sorry, it's caused by a patch in my tree that adds ARM 32b support, resulting in differences
in the context:
- depends on FSL_SOC || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on ARM || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE || FSL_SOC || COMPILE_TEST
I'll send a v2 based on a clean tree.
Madalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists