linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180323132001.7da7f3c4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:20:01 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c

between commit:

  0953feed3400 ("cpufreq: schedutil: rate limits for SCHED_DEADLINE")

from the pm tree and commit:

  8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support")

from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 04d3fe9ba7d2,89fe78ecb88c..000000000000
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@@ -280,11 -276,9 +286,11 @@@ static void sugov_update_single(struct 
  	unsigned int next_f;
  	bool busy;
  
- 	sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time);
+ 	sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
  	sg_cpu->last_update = time;
  
 +	ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy);
 +
  	if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
  		return;
  
@@@ -366,12 -353,7 +365,9 @@@ sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_
  
  	raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
  
 +	ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy);
 +
- 	sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
- 	sg_cpu->flags = flags;
- 
- 	sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time);
+ 	sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
  	sg_cpu->last_update = time;
  
  	if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) {

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped