linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 09/97] rtc: cmos: Do not assume irq 8 for rtc when there are no legacy irqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180323094158.028433526@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:53:56 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 09/97] rtc: cmos: Do not assume irq 8 for rtc when there are no legacy irqs

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>


[ Upstream commit a1e23a42f1bdc00e32fc4869caef12e4e6272f26 ]

On some systems (e.g. Intel Bay Trail systems) the legacy PIC is not
used, in this case virq 8 will be a random irq, rather then hw_irq 8
from the PIC.

Requesting virq 8 in this case will not help us to get alarm irqs and
may cause problems for other drivers which actually do need virq 8,
for example on an Asus Transformer T100TA this leads to:

[ 28.745155] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 00000088 (mmc0) vs. 00000080 (rtc0)
<snip oops>
[ 28.753700] mmc0: Failed to request IRQ 8: -16
[ 28.975934] sdhci-acpi: probe of 80860F14:01 failed with error -16

This commit fixes this by making the rtc-cmos driver continue
without using an irq rather then claiming irq 8 when no irq is
specified in the pnp-info and there are no legacy-irqs.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c |   17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+#include <asm/i8259.h>
+#endif
 
 /* this is for "generic access to PC-style RTC" using CMOS_READ/CMOS_WRITE */
 #include <asm-generic/rtc.h>
@@ -1058,17 +1061,23 @@ static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev
 {
 	cmos_wake_setup(&pnp->dev);
 
-	if (pnp_port_start(pnp, 0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp, 0))
+	if (pnp_port_start(pnp, 0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp, 0)) {
+		unsigned int irq = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
 		/* Some machines contain a PNP entry for the RTC, but
 		 * don't define the IRQ. It should always be safe to
-		 * hardcode it in these cases
+		 * hardcode it on systems with a legacy PIC.
 		 */
+		if (nr_legacy_irqs())
+			irq = 8;
+#endif
 		return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
-				pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), 8);
-	else
+				pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), irq);
+	} else {
 		return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
 				pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0),
 				pnp_irq(pnp, 0));
+	}
 }
 
 static void __exit cmos_pnp_remove(struct pnp_dev *pnp)