[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180323094208.206701990@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:53:13 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Robert White <rwhite@...ox.com>,
Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 065/177] netfilter: nft_dynset: continue to next expr if _OP_ADD succeeded
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 277a292835c196894ef895d5e1fd6170bb916f55 ]
Currently, after adding the following nft rules:
# nft add set x target1 { type ipv4_addr \; flags timeout \;}
# nft add rule x y set add ip daddr timeout 1d @target1 counter
the counters will always be zero despite of the elements are added
to the dynamic set "target1" or not, as we will break the nft expr
traversal unconditionally:
# nft list ruleset
...
set target1 {
...
elements = { 8.8.8.8 expires 23h59m53s}
}
chain output {
...
set add ip daddr timeout 1d @target1 counter packets 0 bytes 0
^ ^
...
}
Since we add the elements to the set successfully, we should continue
to the next expression.
Additionally, if elements are added to "flow table" successfully, we
will _always_ continue to the next expr, even if the operation is
_OP_ADD. So it's better to keep them to be consistent.
Fixes: 22fe54d5fefc ("netfilter: nf_tables: add support for dynamic set updates")
Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@...ox.com>
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
@@ -82,8 +82,7 @@ static void nft_dynset_eval(const struct
nft_set_ext_exists(ext, NFT_SET_EXT_EXPIRATION)) {
timeout = priv->timeout ? : set->timeout;
*nft_set_ext_expiration(ext) = jiffies + timeout;
- } else if (sexpr == NULL)
- goto out;
+ }
if (sexpr != NULL)
sexpr->ops->eval(sexpr, regs, pkt);
@@ -92,7 +91,7 @@ static void nft_dynset_eval(const struct
regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
return;
}
-out:
+
if (!priv->invert)
regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists