linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Don't allow protected pins to be requested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:34:35 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Don't allow protected pins to be
 requested

On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 19:59 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 07:23 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > 
> > Also, you don't allocate chip->valid_mask anywhere.
> 
> So I see now where it's allocated, but something is fishy.

No, it seems you missed %p vs. %px discussion.

The pointers printed by %p nowadays are hashed values, not the original
ones.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy