[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323122902.GR23100@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:29:02 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: speed up to
force empty a memory cgroup
On Fri 23-03-18 12:04:16, Li,Rongqing wrote:
[...]
> shrink_slab does not reclaim any memory, but take lots of time to
> count lru
>
> maybe we can use the returning of shrink_slab to control if next
> shrink_slab should be called?
How? Different memcgs might have different amount of shrinkable memory.
> Or define a slight list_lru_empty to check if sb->s_dentry_lru is
> empty before calling list_lru_shrink_count, like below
Does it really help to improve numbers?
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 672538ca9831..954c22338833 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -130,8 +130,10 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
> if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
> total_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);
>
> - total_objects += list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc);
> - total_objects += list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc);
> + if (!list_lru_empty(sb->s_dentry_lru))
> + total_objects += list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc);
> + if (!list_lru_empty(sb->s_inode_lru))
> + total_objects += list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc);
>
> total_objects = vfs_pressure_ratio(total_objects);
> return total_objects;
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists