linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan, tracing: Use pointer to reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180323101548.1f091c93@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:15:48 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan, tracing: Use pointer to reclaim_stat struct
 in trace event

On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:52:25 +0100
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri 23-03-18 09:47:53, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > The one solution is to pull the tracing file
> > include/trace/events/vmscan.h into mm/ and have a local header to store
> > the reclaim_stat structure that both vmscan.h and vmscan.c can
> > reference.  
> 
> I guess we can live with the public definition as well.
> 

Yes, that would be easier. Thanks!

Then if Andrey's patches are not pulled, then this patch will be good
to go.

-- Steve