[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323142234.GH5799@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:22:34 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Fix pcs_request_gpio() when
bits_per_mux != 0
* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> [180323 03:02]:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:57 PM, David Lechner <david@...hnology.com> wrote:
>
> > This fixes pcs_request_gpio() in the pinctrl-single driver when
> > bits_per_mux != 0. It appears this was overlooked when the multiple
> > pins per register feature was added.
> >
> > Fixes: 4e7e8017a80e ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules")
> > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2 changes:
> > - don't wrap Fixes: line in commit message since it is a special machine-
> > readable line.
>
> Tony/Haojian: are you OK with this change?
No objections from me, would be good if Haojian could
test it with his test cases though.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists