linux-kernel - Re: Return checks for clock calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Da0GbkC1vjjbyNmG77gvd-KO8HC-2oBYxAffNHCtEDKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 21:27:14 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Cc:     "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Adriana Reus <adriana.reus@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "abelvesa@...ux.com" <abelvesa@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: Return checks for clock calls

Hi Abel,

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com> wrote:
> Hi Shawn, Fabio,
>
> I'm trying to get the imx clks changes upstreamed. To that end, I reached this
> old commit that adds some wrappers over the generic clk API. Here is the commit
> message:
>
>         ARM: imx6: add return check for clock calls
>
>         There are a bunch of clk_enable_prepare, clk_set_parent and clk_set_rate
>         calls in imx6 clock driver's initialization.  They are called without
>         retunr check.  If there is something going wrong with the calls, they
>         will just fail silently.
>
>         The patch creates a set of helper functions imx_clk_enable_prepare,
>         imx_clk_set_parent and imx_clk_set_rate, and use them instead from clock
>         initialization to check the return and print error message to tell
>         failures if any.
>
>         Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
>
> And it adds the imx_clk_set_parent, imx_clk_prepare_enable and
> imx_clk_set_rate which basically just print an error message if the generic
> functions have failed.
>
> The only plus of these wrappers is that we at least see that the generic
> functions have failed, but the behaviour is not changed in any way.
>
> Question is, do we want this upstreamed considering that we need to replace the
> calls throughout all the older imx socs ?

IMHO we should not introduce these new helper functions.

We can simply explicitly check for errors with the existing clock
functions when needed.