linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/11] staging: iio: tsl2x7x: remove ch0 and ch1 variables from tsl2x7x_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180324134248.1faeb2ff@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:42:48 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jon.Brenner@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] staging: iio: tsl2x7x: remove ch0 and ch1
 variables from tsl2x7x_get_lux()

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 06:29:10 -0400
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:

> Remove the ch0 and ch1 variables from tsl2x7x_get_lux() and
> write those values directly into the chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0
> and chip->als_cur_info.als_ch01 variables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Hmm. A marginal improvement in readability I suppose, but not a big one.
This I wouldn't have bothered changing but fair enough.

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> index 1e38e8449f9e..65b7fbca8c5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> @@ -336,7 +336,6 @@ static int tsl2x7x_write_control_reg(struct tsl2X7X_chip *chip, u8 data)
>   */
>  static int tsl2x7x_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  {
> -	u16 ch0, ch1; /* separated ch0/ch1 data from device */
>  	u32 lux; /* raw lux calculated from device data */
>  	u64 lux64;
>  	u32 ratio;
> @@ -382,24 +381,24 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* extract ALS/lux data */
> -	ch0 = le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&buf[0]);
> -	ch1 = le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&buf[2]);
> +	chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0 = le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&buf[0]);
> +	chip->als_cur_info.als_ch1 = le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&buf[2]);
>  
> -	chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0 = ch0;
> -	chip->als_cur_info.als_ch1 = ch1;
> -
> -	if (ch0 >= chip->als_saturation || ch1 >= chip->als_saturation) {
> +	if (chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0 >= chip->als_saturation ||
> +	    chip->als_cur_info.als_ch1 >= chip->als_saturation) {
>  		lux = TSL2X7X_LUX_CALC_OVER_FLOW;
>  		goto return_max;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!ch0) {
> +	if (!chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0) {
>  		/* have no data, so return LAST VALUE */
>  		ret = chip->als_cur_info.lux;
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}
> +
>  	/* calculate ratio */
> -	ratio = (ch1 << 15) / ch0;
> +	ratio = (chip->als_cur_info.als_ch1 << 15) / chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0;
> +
>  	/* convert to unscaled lux using the pointer to the table */
>  	p = (struct tsl2x7x_lux *)chip->tsl2x7x_device_lux;
>  	while (p->ratio != 0 && p->ratio < ratio)
> @@ -408,9 +407,9 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  	if (p->ratio == 0) {
>  		lux = 0;
>  	} else {
> -		lux = DIV_ROUND_UP(ch0 * p->ch0,
> +		lux = DIV_ROUND_UP(chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0 * p->ch0,
>  				   tsl2x7x_als_gain[chip->settings.als_gain]) -
> -		      DIV_ROUND_UP(ch1 * p->ch1,
> +		      DIV_ROUND_UP(chip->als_cur_info.als_ch1 * p->ch1,
>  				   tsl2x7x_als_gain[chip->settings.als_gain]);
>  	}
>