[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180324043044.GA22733@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 21:30:44 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and
env_start|end in mm_struct
> So, introduce a new rwlock in mm_struct to protect the concurrent access
> to arg_start|end and env_start|end.
I don't think an rwlock makes much sense here. There is almost no
concurrency on the read side, and an rwlock is more expensive than
a spinlock. Just use a spinlock.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists