linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 06/16] rtc: mediatek: remove unnecessary parentheses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1521875652.28226.29.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date:   Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:14:12 +0800
From:   Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:     <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <sre@...nel.org>,
        <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/16] rtc: mediatek: remove unnecessary parentheses

On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 11:21 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 23/03/2018 at 17:15:03 +0800, sean.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > Remove unnecessary parentheses due to explicit C operator precedence.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > index 0df7ccd..4411c08 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data)
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = regmap_read(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_IRQ_STA, &irqsta);
> > -	if ((ret >= 0) && (irqsta & RTC_IRQ_STA_AL)) {
> > +	if (ret >= 0 && irqsta & RTC_IRQ_STA_AL) {
> 
> I don't think this makes the code particularly clearer.
> 

But it is still a one of check items in checkpatch

CHECK:UNNECESSARY_PARENTHESES: Unnecessary parentheses around 'ret >= 0'
#126: FILE: drivers/rtc/rtc-xxx.c:109:
+       if ((ret >= 0) && (irqsta & RTC_IRQ_STA_AL)) {


or we still want to keep it in parentheses around here?

> >  		rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
> >  		irqen = irqsta & ~RTC_IRQ_EN_AL;
> >  		mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
>