[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.1803251413010.19824@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 14:14:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
robin.murphy@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
behanw@...verseincode.com, keescook@...omium.org,
Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@...aro.org, mka@...omium.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] bus: arm-cci: use asm unreachable
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Mixing asm and C code is not recommended in a naked function by
> gcc and leads to an error when using clang:
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:2107:2: error: non-ASM statement in naked
> function is not supported
> unreachable();
> ^
>
> While the function is marked __naked it actually properly return
> in asm. There is no need for the unreachable() call.
>
> Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
If that doesn't introduce any warning with gcc then I'm fine with it.
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't add assembly ASM_UNREACHABLE, just drop unreachable()
>
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index 5426c04fe24b..fc2da3a617ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -2103,8 +2103,6 @@ asmlinkage void __naked cci_enable_port_for_self(void)
> [sizeof_struct_cpu_port] "i" (sizeof(struct cpu_port)),
> [sizeof_struct_ace_port] "i" (sizeof(struct cci_ace_port)),
> [offsetof_port_phys] "i" (offsetof(struct cci_ace_port, phys)) );
> -
> - unreachable();
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.16.2
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists