[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV9xW8o6zuOmOxB+=h1XTdi-VFq2mp897SUjZKtRMOWOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:22:24 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Przemyslaw Sroka <psroka@...ence.com>,
Arkadiusz Golec <agolec@...ence.com>,
Alan Douglas <adouglas@...ence.com>,
Bartosz Folta <bfolta@...ence.com>,
Damian Kos <dkos@...ence.com>,
Alicja Jurasik-Urbaniak <alicja@...ence.com>,
Cyprian Wronka <cwronka@...ence.com>,
Suresh Punnoose <sureshp@...ence.com>,
Rafal Ciepiela <rafalc@...ence.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Xiang Lin <Xiang.Lin@...aptics.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] dt-bindings: i3c: Document core bindings
Hi Boris,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:
> From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>
> A new I3C subsystem has been added and a generic description has been
> created to represent the I3C bus and the devices connected on it.
>
> Document this generic representation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/i3c.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> +I3C devices
> +===========
> +
> +All I3C devices are supposed to support DAA (Dynamic Address Assignment), and
> +are thus discoverable. So, by default, I3C devices do not have to be described
> +in the device tree.
But if they're described, they should have a compatible value, no?
> +This being said, one might want to attach extra resources to these devices,
> +and those resources may have to be described in the device tree, which in turn
> +means we have to describe I3C devices.
> +
> +Another use case for describing an I3C device in the device tree is when this
> +I3C device has a static address and we want to assign it a specific dynamic
> +address before the DAA takes place (so that other devices on the bus can't
> +take this dynamic address).
> +
> +The I3C device should be names <device-type>@<static-address>,<i3c-pid>,
named
So the i3c-pid in the unit address is represented as a 64-bit number, not as two
comma-separated 32-bit numbers?
> +Example:
> +
> + i3c-master@...0000 {
> + compatible = "cdns,i3c-master";
> + clocks = <&coreclock>, <&i3csysclock>;
> + clock-names = "pclk", "sysclk";
> + interrupts = <3 0>;
> + reg = <0x0d040000 0x1000>;
> + #address-cells = <3>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + status = "okay";
> + i2c-scl-frequency = <100000>;
> +
> + /* I2C device. */
> + nunchuk: nunchuk@52 {
@52,8000001000000000?
> + compatible = "nintendo,nunchuk";
> + reg = <0x52 0x80000010 0x0>;
> + };
> +
> + /* I3C device with a static address. */
> + thermal_sensor: sensor@68,39200144004 {
No compatible value?
> + reg = <0x68 0x392 0x144004>;
> + assigned-address = <0xa>;
> + };
> +
> + /*
> + * I3C device without a static address but requiring resources
> + * described in the DT.
> + */
> + sensor@0,39200154004 {
No compatible value?
> + reg = <0x0 0x392 0x154004>;
> + clocks = <&clock_provider 0>;
> + };
> + };
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists