[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180326104205.GA12425@amd>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:42:05 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, groeck@...omium.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] pwm-backlight: enable/disable the PWM
before/after LCD enable toggle.
On Mon 2018-03-26 11:52:09, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and
> vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on
> the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence
> to follow the specs.
>
> For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence:
> - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux)
> - N116BGE (Innolux)
> - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux)
> - B101EAN0 (Auo)
> - B101AW03 (Auo)
> - LTN101NT05 (Samsung)
> - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa)
Ok, but this changes behaviour for other panels, too. Are you sure you
are not breaking one of those?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists