[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87muyv2ek9.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:42:46 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] Enlightened VMCS support for KVM on Hyper-V
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> writes:
> Changes since v5:
> - Fix a couple of issues reported by kbuild test robot, both in
> PATCH7 (hope Radim's Reviewed-by: stands).
>
> When running nested KVM on Hyper-V it's possible to use so called
> 'Enlightened VMCS' and do normal memory reads/writes instead of
> doing VMWRITE/VMREAD instructions. In addition, clean field mask
> provides a huge room for optimization on L0's side.
>
> Tight CPUID loop test shows significant speedup (E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz):
> Before: 18890 cycles
> After: 8304 cycles
>
Paolo, Radim,
with Thomas' ACK on the series:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg166309.html
is there anything else needed for it to get merged (hoping for 4.17)?
Thanks,
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists