[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180326134007.GA15204@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:40:07 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Failure to build using next-20180326 and
next-20180323
The real problem is commit 1f85b42a691cd8329ba82dbcaeec80ac1231b32a from
the arm64 tree, which eventually need to be reverted and redone properly.
But for now a fixup to rename the arm64 dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma
helper is enough to build.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:20:30PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While building on arm64, the commit b6e05477c10c ("dma/direct: Handle the memory encryption bit in common code") breaks the compilation using defconfig:
>
> CC arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.o
> In file included from arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:27:0:
> ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:40:26: error: redefinition of ‘phys_to_dma’
> static inline dma_addr_t phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:9:0,
> from arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:27:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-direct.h:12:26: note: previous definition of ‘phys_to_dma’ was here
> static inline dma_addr_t phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:13:0,
> from ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:5,
> from arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:27:
> ./include/linux/dma-direct.h: In function ‘phys_to_dma’:
> ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:42:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__phys_to_dma’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> return __sme_set(__phys_to_dma(dev, paddr));
> ^
> ./include/linux/mem_encrypt.h:50:24: note: in definition of macro ‘__sme_set’
> #define __sme_set(x) (x)
> ^
> In file included from arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:27:0:
> ./include/linux/dma-direct.h: At top level:
> ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:45:27: error: redefinition of ‘dma_to_phys’
> static inline phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:9:0,
> from arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:27:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-direct.h:19:27: note: previous definition of ‘dma_to_phys’ was here
> static inline phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:13:0,
> from ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:5,
> from arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c:27:
> ./include/linux/dma-direct.h: In function ‘dma_to_phys’:
> ./include/linux/dma-direct.h:47:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__dma_to_phys’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> return __sme_clr(__dma_to_phys(dev, daddr));
> ^
> ./include/linux/mem_encrypt.h:51:24: note: in definition of macro ‘__sme_clr’
> #define __sme_clr(x) (x)
> ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:312: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.o' failed
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.o] Error 1
> Makefile:1057: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm' failed
> make: *** [arch/arm64/mm] Error 2
>
> Reverting the commit fixes the build.
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Armstrong
> Embedded Linux Software Engineer
> BayLibre - At the Heart of Embedded Linux
> www.baylibre.com
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists