linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 06/22] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1522073569-29174-7-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:12:33 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.martin@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
        mark.rutland@....com, ckadabi@...eaurora.org,
        shankerd@...eaurora.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        jnair@...iumnetworks.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/22] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification

Now that each capability describes how to treat the conflicts
of CPU cap state vs System wide cap state, we can unify the
verification logic to a single place.

Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 0b8e6b9..1fda957 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1306,6 +1306,58 @@ enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Run through the list of capabilities to check for conflicts.
+ * If the system has already detected a capability, take necessary
+ * action on this CPU.
+ *
+ * Returns "false" on conflicts.
+ */
+static bool
+__verify_local_cpu_caps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
+{
+	bool cpu_has_cap, system_has_cap;
+	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps;
+
+	for (caps = caps_list; caps->matches; caps++) {
+		cpu_has_cap = __this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability);
+		system_has_cap = cpus_have_cap(caps->capability);
+
+		if (system_has_cap) {
+			/*
+			 * Check if the new CPU misses an advertised feature,
+			 * which is not safe to miss.
+			 */
+			if (!cpu_has_cap && !cpucap_late_cpu_optional(caps))
+				break;
+			/*
+			 * We have to issue cpu_enable() irrespective of
+			 * whether the CPU has it or not, as it is enabeld
+			 * system wide. It is upto the call back to take
+			 * appropriate action on this CPU.
+			 */
+			if (caps->cpu_enable)
+				caps->cpu_enable(caps);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Check if the CPU has this capability if it isn't
+			 * safe to have when the system doesn't.
+			 */
+			if (cpu_has_cap && !cpucap_late_cpu_permitted(caps))
+				break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (caps->matches) {
+		pr_crit("CPU%d: Detected conflict for capability %d (%s), System: %d, CPU: %d\n",
+			smp_processor_id(), caps->capability,
+			caps->desc, system_has_cap, cpu_has_cap);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
  * Check for CPU features that are used in early boot
  * based on the Boot CPU value.
  */
@@ -1327,25 +1379,10 @@ verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps)
 		}
 }
 
-static void
-verify_local_cpu_features(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
+static void verify_local_cpu_features(void)
 {
-	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = caps_list;
-	for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
-		if (!cpus_have_cap(caps->capability))
-			continue;
-		/*
-		 * If the new CPU misses an advertised feature, we cannot proceed
-		 * further, park the cpu.
-		 */
-		if (!__this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability)) {
-			pr_crit("CPU%d: missing feature: %s\n",
-					smp_processor_id(), caps->desc);
-			cpu_die_early();
-		}
-		if (caps->cpu_enable)
-			caps->cpu_enable(caps);
-	}
+	if (!__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_features))
+		cpu_die_early();
 }
 
 static void verify_sve_features(void)
@@ -1372,20 +1409,8 @@ static void verify_sve_features(void)
  */
 static void verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
 {
-	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = arm64_errata;
-
-	for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
-		if (cpus_have_cap(caps->capability)) {
-			if (caps->cpu_enable)
-				caps->cpu_enable(caps);
-		} else if (caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU)) {
-			pr_crit("CPU%d: Requires work around for %s, not detected"
-					" at boot time\n",
-				smp_processor_id(),
-				caps->desc ? : "an erratum");
-			cpu_die_early();
-		}
-	}
+	if (!__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_errata))
+		cpu_die_early();
 }
 
 static void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
@@ -1409,7 +1434,7 @@ static void __init enable_errata_workarounds(void)
 static void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
 {
 	verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds();
-	verify_local_cpu_features(arm64_features);
+	verify_local_cpu_features();
 	verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);
 
 	if (system_supports_32bit_el0())
-- 
2.7.4