[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180326153520.GC22084@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 09:35:20 -0600
From: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
To: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver
On Thu, Mar 22 2018 at 19:30 -0600, David Collins wrote:
>Hello Stephen,
>
>Thank you for the very detailed review feedback.
>
>On 03/21/2018 12:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting David Collins (2018-03-16 18:09:10)
>>> +static int rpmh_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rpmh_pmic *pmic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +
>>> + rpmh_release(pmic->rpmh_client);
>>
>> I'm still lost on what rpmh_client is giving us besides more code we
>> don't need. I'll ping the rpmh thread again.
>
>Let's see if Lina is willing to add some devm_* calls so that no cleanup
>is required.
>
I will look into this.
-- Lina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists