[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19a54db9-b0bd-5661-de2a-c5ee76e733d9@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:58:59 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, stable@...nel.org, linuxram@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: do not special case protection key 0
On 03/26/2018 11:53 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/26/2018 10:47 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>
>> Also what happens "pkey_free() pkey-0" - can you elaborate more on that
>> "silliness consequences"
>
> It's just what happens if you free any other pkey that is in use: it
> might get reallocated later. The most likely scenario is that you will
> get pkey-0 back from pkey_alloc(), you will set an access-disable or
> write-disable bit in PKRU for it, and your next stack access will SIGSEGV.
>
Thanks. This will good information to include in the commit log.
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists