[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180326221948.GA17814@alison-desk.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:19:48 -0700
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Luck@...son-desk.jf.intel.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, brice.goglin@...il.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86,sched: allow topologies where NUMA nodes share an
LLC
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 04:30:29PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 01:49:22PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote:
> > + if (!topology_same_node(c, o) &&
> > + (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
> > + c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X)) {
>
> Maybe make life easier in the future to add more models
> to the list by using x86_match_cpu() here?
>
> -Tony
Tony -
Am I on the right track below?
Define like this:
static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id snc_cpu[] = {
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X },
{}
};
Use like this:
if (!topology_same_node(c, o) && x86_match_cpu(snc_cpu)) {
Thanks,
alisons
Powered by blists - more mailing lists